asks nothing but . That beliefs about who one is and what is real are a direct cause of oneself and of one's own realities. I was expecting something pretty dumb, but am always interested to see what people think about quantum mechanics. He announced in 1994 (one year after the study) that violent crime had decreased 18%. You should be wary whenever you hear something like, "Quantum mechanics connects you with the universe" or "quantum mechanics unifies you with everything else." Pingback: yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? The reason you should be suspicious is because we don't even understand classical consciousness. If it were manifest, you could run at a wall a lot of times, and every now and then you'd spontaneously appear on the other side of the wall. While the movie "What The Bleep" has some flaws from a science point of view, science of this type is so foreign to most people, that they feel they have to "jazz it up" to keep people interested. DVD (2005) Marlee Matlin, Arntz (DIR) cert 12 at the best online prices at eBay! What the Bleep!? "I create my own reality, says quantum physics," intones one expert, and the viewer could be lured to accept this as proof. ft. house now used as offices), the Great Hall (a converted 15,375 sq. This is one reason physicists studying a subatomic particle create large numbers of them in particle accelerators. Moreover, assume that they want your money. The Christian Science Monitor has expired. It was clearly time to check the facts for myself. These photos may well be art they're sure as hell not science. Where were we now? The quantum mechanical correlations, the spooky action at a distance that quantum mechanics brings up, is true only for very specially prepared systems that are isolated from the rest of the world, completely. HCI president Peter Vegso stated that in regard to this book, "What the Bleep is the quantum leap in the New Age world," and "by marrying science and spirituality, it is the foundation of future thought."[5]. [5], According to the makers of the film, "Bleep" is an expurgation of "fuck". Consciousness must be involved. All those things can be attributed to quantum mechanics first of all, because it's so poorly understood by the public, and especially because it's so verifiably weird. They may applaud the central tenets of the movie, but not its disjointed narrative, clunky acting, bizarre thematic segues, and faux "facts." In the letter, the authors write: "the movie illustrates the uncertainty principle with a bouncing basketball being in several places at once. http://unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=36&si=770458&issue_id=7565, http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf, Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Down the Rabbit Hole. and of course the big guy himself, Ramtha. On August 1, 2006 What the Bleep! It's more like a collision in the editing room between talking heads, an impenetrable human parable and a hallucinogenic animated cartoon. For starters you'd have to take a lot of samples from different parts of each ice specimen. I don't know how many times I've heard people say, "Oh, I love quantum mechanics because I'm really into meditation, or I love the spiritual benefits that it brings me." It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles. We hear more and more from JZ Knight, a woman channeling the ancient warrior Ramtha, a chap who (through Knight) incidentally leads the Ramtha School of Enlightenment. In one experiment, people who were walking across a college campus were asked by a stranger for directions. In fact, "you are God in the making," which explains why Shirley MacLaine is a Ramtha fan. They were showing us the pictures of the waves converging to a point a meditation trick and this picture had a caption explaining that the unified field theory has already been found. Quantum mechanics is a replacement for the phrase "anything goes." There are also phrases plagiarized entire from "The Matrix," a far superior film treatment of the notion that reality isn't what it seems. Fred Alan Wolf, PhD in What the Bleep Do We Know? (stylized as What t #$*! Dr Dispenza claims (correctly) in the movie that brain scans PET (Positron Emission Tomography) and Functional MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) show that the same part of your brain lights up whether you're looking at something or just remembering it. The main weird thing about them was they were printed on pink paper instead of white. But it's quite a leap to say the brain doesn't know the difference between vision and memory. Once anything goes, you can have anything you want. (Refugees in Sudan or people in Baghdad would have an even tougher time accepting the film's premise.). [18] A BBC reviewer described it as "a documentary aimed at the totally gullible". They were spreading their methods of meditation but that was not the main thing that impressed me. Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. Those points suggest that quantum-derived "possibilities" affect the wider world, that human thought is the ultimate arbiter of physical reality, and that by manipulating thought properly, people can achieve harmony and even shape the structure of matter. "Contrary to ordinary beliefs, quantum physics is very predictive," Dr. de Gouva continues. So thanks to Associate Professor Zdenka Kuncik, Professor Peter Schofield and Professor Max Coltheart for shedding some light on the Bleeping thing. Is that last line The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable some sort of strange attack on SUSY models? "I think the point is that Feynman realized that people can be fooled, but nature can't.". In 1958 nasa started mapping the ocean and exploring it. We Last night I went to see a movie which was advertised as being about quantum physics, called What the Bleep Do We Know?. The film has been described as an example of quantum mysticism, and has been criticized for both misrepresenting science and containing pseudoscience. Featured individuals [ edit] The film features interview segments of: Amanda is a divorced woman who makes a living as a photographer. A lot of the propaganda from them was hilarious, especially whenever candidates attempted to hold public speeches and performing demonstrations of yogic flying. Hobbs further disputed the film's use of the ten percent of the brain myth. The bits and pieces of matter that make up sub-atomic particles (protons, neutrons and electrons) don't exist in any handy, measurable way unless they're interacting with one another. One other area where quantum mechanics works on a macroscopic scale is in superconductivity and superfluidity. It'd be like being the CEO of a massive company and having to listen to what every single employee was doing every minute of every day. ?Discovering the Endless Possibilities of Your Everyday Reality. On August 1, 2006 What the Bleep! According to an article in Fortean Times by David Hambling, the origins of this story likely involved the voyages of Captain James Cook, not Columbus, and an account related by Robert Hughes which said Cook's ships were "complex and unfamiliar as to defy the natives' understanding". Answer (1 of 6): Although not being as well educated in the area as Professor Wacker, I think it's overly simplistic to suggest the subjects raised in the movie to be either factual or "almost completely mumbo-jumbo". It's recognized as pedagogical exaggeration. As the sample size grows, so does the scientist's confidence in the statistical inferences drawn from the large sample. That's what makes the world so interesting. As a series of scientists and scientist types take a wayward stab at explaining quantum theory -- it seems to involve being in two places at once -- "What the Bleep," which opens nationwide today . He is also the theologian in residence of RSE. With Alejandro Jodorowsky, Horacio Salinas, Zamira Saunders, Juan Ferrara. The only problem with Andrew Newberg's statement is that it suggests our subconscious brains are doing really interesting stuff and we're somehow missing out; if only we could harness that other zillion gigabits or so we'd be masters of our destinies. so much for no good or bad, that is unless it is convienent. Even followers of spiritual traditions that believe in worldly illusion will have problems with "Bleep." He says he is "profoundly unsympathetic to attempts at linking quantum mechanics with consciousness".[1]. Everyone is still talking about the movie What the Bleep Do We Know!? You can't bring good things to you by thinking about them. Easton's 1897 Bible Dictionary. What the Bleep Do We Know postulates the existence of a spiritual connection between the realms of quantum physics and consciousness, demonstrating this through inspiring visual effects, story-telling and interviews with experts. Q: Obviously, quantum mechanics has lots of real-life applications, including in your television set and your microwave oven. He claims the drop was achieved. Heisenberg basically says you can't get a really accurate fix on both the position and the momentum of a subatomic particle say an electron at the same time. It sounds reasonable, and familiar. Do We Know!? Cathleen Falsani, who must have been taking notes while I was staring gobsmacked at the screen, quotes the 35,year-old . But the movie gradually moves to quantum 'insights' that lead a woman to toss away her antidepressant medication, to the quantum channeling of Ramtha, the 35,000-year-old Lemurian warrior, and on to even greater nonsense." 34 talking about this. That's not the case. We'll never know. Now I don't have an automatic prejudice against 35,000-year-old warriors from Atlantis or the women who channel them. The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too. Those are two places where the quantum world leaks into the classical world. ?, with over 15 hours of material on three double-sided DVDs. We're not using either superconductivity or superfluidity yet on the scale that I think people thought we might. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith (accessed: April 20, 2009)A note about Fred Wolf's qualifications: He has a Ph.D in Theoretical Physics from UCLA in 1963, although he has not worked in laboratory endeavours since that time. This is an explanation to help understand what might be going on, but it is not part of the theory because it is not falsifiable: it cannot be tested in such a way that, if it were false, it would fail the test (without falsifying the whole of quantum mechanics, and therefore all the other interpretations too). . Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed and 2. VISiT http://docsubtitles.blogspot.comsubscribe to watch full moviecheck also short trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJOrsql3KwU What the #$*! 6. " " " !". That's one of the very strange properties of quantum mechanics. The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just entertainment.